|
|
|
|
|
|
by protocolture
102 days ago
|
|
|
>It is quite literally a fuzzy way of copying. Even if it involved copying that isnt immediately an issue. Its the distribution of a copy thats an issue. And if you look at the data side by side, you can see that while copying might be part of the process of creating an LLM, the LLM is not a copy of its source material. |
|
|