|
|
|
|
|
by docybo
98 days ago
|
|
Feels like most agent security discussions focus on where the agent runs (VMs, sandboxes, etc), but not whether the action itself should execute. Even in a locked-down VM the agent can still send emails, spin up infra, hit APIs, burn tokens. A pattern we've been experimenting with is putting an authorization boundary between the runtime and the tools it calls. The runtime proposes an action, a policy evaluates it, and the action only runs if authorization verifies. Curious if others building agent runtimes are exploring similar patterns. |
|