|
|
|
|
|
|
by afavour
99 days ago
|
|
|
If I had to make a wild guess, xAI. The article states they took a job at a government contractor. It’s interesting (horrifying) to think of the implications actually. People wouldn’t buy this data directly, it’s too obviously illegally procured. But laundered through an LLM to provide “insights” without citation? That’s plausible deniability. |
|
|