|
|
|
|
|
by safteylayer
102 days ago
|
|
Exactly — this is the circular nightmare in action. 1. Dev gets 401 / rate-limit / weird error
2. Pastes full API key + request into GPT-4o / Claude for "why isn't this working?"
3. That key (or close pattern) enters the training pipeline
4. Model learns valid key structures / patterns from real usage
5. Later prompts extract similar internals (like our EPHEMERAL_KEY leaks) I saw this repeatedly: different vectors → same leaked concept every time. Your bill-spike point is brutal. We ran these tests for ~$0.04. An attacker could probe 10,000 variants for $4 and map your API surface before you notice anything. Key rotation helps post-breach, but proactive multi-vector probing (what we're building continuous tests for) catches the pattern before exploitation. Spot-on observation. Thanks. |
|