|
|
|
|
|
by foxes
105 days ago
|
|
But thats the point, an llm is a vastly different object to a calculator. Its a new type of tool for better or worse based on probabilities, distributions. If you can internalise that fact and look at it like having a probable answer rather than an exact answer it makes sense. Calculators cant have a stab at writing an entire c compiler. A lot of people cant either or takes a lot of iteration anyway, no one one shotted complicated code before llms either. I feel discussion shouldnt be about how they work as the fundamental objection, rather the costs and impacts they have. |
|