|
|
|
|
|
by mindslight
106 days ago
|
|
So your definition is based on it being incorrect to call anything else besides Mussolini's Italy or Hitler's Germany fascist? That's not particularly germane to discussion or analysis, which is why I was asking for other general definitions. |
|
"My side" is my side because I perceive this movement as fascist, or at least close enough to oppose it on that grounds.
I was much happier both sidesing when digital authoritarianism was centered around theoretically-voluntary digital services, and both the red and blue political teams were pushing bureaucratic authoritarianism.
In my estimation, the red team has switched to autocratic authoritarianism, taken control of the digital authoritarian systems of surveillance and control, while engaging in populist rallying with most of the standard tropes of fascists.
As I said, I am open to examining whether it makes sense to apply the term fascist or not. But to do that we need a definition that lays out the general characteristics of fascism, at least as you see it. So far neither of you have supplied one.