|
|
|
|
|
by lowsong
106 days ago
|
|
> you're admitting that businesses do see SWE as cogs in a wheel and seasonally try to replace them... Not quite. I agree that companies will try to do this, but every company that has tried to treat engineering staff as replaceable units of person-hours has failed. > Metrics, performance reviews, sprint velocity, delivery timelines, all orbit around observable artifacts because those are what management systems can actually track objectively and equitably. It's a handy abstraction just like looking only at the ins/outs of a logic gate as opposed to looking at the implementation and wiring. Yes, and these metrics are, usually, worthless. It's not that companies and managers will not try to replace engineers with AI. I'm sure they will. I'm sure many will be laid off because "AI does it cheaper now". My point is that companies that have gone down this route in the past have failed, and AI is no different. Companies that lean strongly into AI as a workforce replacement will fail too. |
|