[orf]

Their boundaries. If they don’t want to accept the code, cool. Nobody is forcing them to, and I respect that.

But if they can’t enforce their boundaries, because they can’t tell the difference between AI code and non-AI code without being told, then their boundaries they made up are unenforceable nonsense.

About as nonsense and enforceable as asking me to code upside down.

[jacquesm]

I'll make this blunt: if you're a guy then half the population is not capable of 'enforcing their boundaries' against you, more so if you count children. The problem you seem to have is to think that if someone is not capable of enforcing their boundaries that they are not allowed to have those boundaries and that it is your god given right to do whatever the F* you want just because you can. That's not how the world works, nor is it how it should work.

Boundaries - of all kinds - are not unenforceable nonsense, they are rights that you willingly and knowingly violate.

[duskdozer]

So we're back to might makes right then: "you can't stop me, so I'll do whatever I want to you."

[orf]

What a reductive argument. Is this your first day on planet earth? If so, here’s what you need to know:

- people can just say things

- when people say things, you don’t have to listen to them

- not listening to them doesn’t make you superior or more powerful than them

We can practice: I’d like you to always comment in uppercase letters from now on please. It’s my policy.

[hananova]

You are literally being the cliché of “Techbros don’t understand consent.” Don’t be that way.

[jacquesm]

I was holding back from writing precisely that, thank you.