Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Barrin92 105 days ago
>Is there some reason Lisp is superior to any other general-purpose programming language for text editing?

purely for text editing? No. But that's not what distinguishes Emacs, it's famously very mediocre at it. The point of Emacs is to be a fully transparent, inspectable, dynamic and changeable environment. In spirit similar to Smalltalk systems like Pharo. And for that a Lisp is not the only choice but a very good one.

There's very few languages and environments that facilitate jumping into any place, making a change, compiling or evaluating a block of code or treating it as data and continuing seamlessly.
2 comments
antiframe 104 days ago
> But that's not what distinguishes Emacs, it's famously very mediocre at it.

I disagree. Every time I use another editor I lament missing features when it comes to editing text. Like most editors (vim excluded) have pretty lackluster undo, transpose, case altering, and text reflowing commands.

link
NetMageSCW 105 days ago
An editor environment based on Smalltalk would be very interesting.
link
klibertp 104 days ago
See GToolkit[1] - Lepiter is a bit like that. It's too notebook-y for my taste, but it lets you write and format text and embed any widget. It also uses a native GUI and is not a repackaged browser.

[1] https://gtoolkit.com/

link
jdougan 104 days ago
Did they do anything to fix the OpenSmalltalk VM lamentable keyboard input?
link