|
|
|
|
|
|
by Muskwalker
107 days ago
|
|
|
The Thaler case here is something different than "AI-generated = uncopyrightable" though. Thaler was not trying to copyright work in the way humans who make work with tools normally copyright their work ("Copyright 2026 by Me"), he was specifically trying to give AI the copyright ("Copyright 2026 by My-AI-Tool"). The court rejected this because only humans can own copyright. I believe there are other cases where AI-generated works were found uncopyrightable but Thaler is not a good example* of them. |
|
|