|
|
|
|
|
|
by avaer
108 days ago
|
|
|
I wish the original title was kept ("How to win a best paper award"). It seems a good list for that. Most of this list is about how to dress for senpai; figuratively speaking. A pretty depressing take on "how to do important research that matters". I would hope that would be of the most unimportant part of science, totally irrelevant to what's important and what matters. But maybe that's not true today. |
|
|
How is that the case? The tips seem to aim for impactful research: picking good ideas and executing well on them. There's a tacit assumption that such impactful research will win best paper awards, but that's actually not substantiated and isn't obviously correct, since best paper selection committees can't see the future. For example, many (maybe most?) winners of retrospective awards (test-of-time / influential paper) aren't papers that won a best paper award when originally published.
Most of the author's papers he cites in the post, including the membership inference paper which is one of the papers the author is "most proud of," didn't win best paper awards.