Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stereo 94 days ago
Nice hack! Would hosting controllers on individual IPv6 addresses on the same VM solve this too?
1 comments
baconomatic 94 days ago
Yeah IPv6 would solve this because we wouldn't have to go through the proxy at all, since each VM could get their own. Unfortunately IPv6 isn't quite as supported as we'd like.
link
baby_souffle 94 days ago
Ubiquity in general has had garbage support for IPv6 since the beginning.

They claimed most of their customers aren't asking for it when I pushed them on the issue years ago.

link
FireBeyond 93 days ago
Yup, absolutely. I'm so annoyed by this. I haven't been able to get either my Comcast IPv6 address pool set up and usable throughout my home network (three switches and two Unifi Pro 6 WAPs, across a few VLANs), nor my HE.net tunnel.

So annoyed.

link
baby_souffle 93 days ago
I use Ubnt for layer 1 and 2. Their switches are nice if your needs can be met by their spog. Same with their access points although I haven’t see a good one from then since WiFi 5. Their latest WiFi 7 ap is top dollar but used last generation chip and has a cooling fan :[

Dont use unit for routing, though.

link