|
|
|
|
|
|
by scubbo
106 days ago
|
|
|
> they serve the interests [...of] the incumbents Yes. The employees. That's the point. > while [...] ignoring the larger consequences like the whole company Good. That is, again, the point - to advocate for the employees when their interests are in opposition to those of the company. You say they're counterproductive - sounds like they're working exactly as intended. |
|
|
it can lead to the whole company or industry to be destroyed, so while it may protect the specific incumbents it puts the whole industry/country in jeopardy. in aggregate these things can work against favour.
if everyone ends up doing this the system can't work