[jrm4]

I mostly don't like this take because it presumes a precise definition of privacy that we all agree on. And it's not even remotely close to that, which is why I think the Bluesky model is perhaps insidious.

[fritzo]

Good point. For sake of argument, how about this stratification of privacy levels:

twitter/x/bluesky - a big tech company owns your data

mastodon - a grassroots community organization owns your data

zulip - someone you've met personally owns the data

your blog - you own the data

(and yes these are a bit of a category error, but to achieve privacy maybe we should broaden the category and sacrifice reach)

[jrm4]

Well, the problem is, now the word "owns" isn't really helpful either?

Because you have "possesses" (which can be anyone) vs. "controls?"

Twitter - single point of big company external control

Mastodon - One or multiple unverifiable fallible likely grassroots, points of external control

Bluesky - Once out, merely the illusion of control, because your data is out there, verifiable?.