|
|
|
|
|
by dtolnay
105 days ago
|
|
If a piece of code does not panic in panic=unwind, then it does not panic in panic=abort either. So having coverage of panic=unwind would be sufficient to guarantee that code cannot panic. The caveat you mention with panic=abort would only apply to code that is unable to build for panic=unwind, which is uncommon. |
|
On that note, thank you for all your work!