[blini-kot]

"Tehran oil sites on fire as Iran exchanges strikes with Israel and US – video report"

You know, the usual independent and objective framing - its "Iran exchanges strikes", not "Israel and US started a war of aggression amid negotiations and bombed Tehran" or whatever

[spiderfarmer]

Earlier today in the NYTimes, this gem of unbiased headlines:

"A U.S. Tomahawk missile hit a naval base beside an Iranian school, video shows."

While in the article:

"A newly released video adds to the evidence that an American missile likely hit an Iranian elementary school where 175 people, many of them children, were reported killed."

So:

"Evidence shows US Tomahawk Missile Killed 175 people after it hits a Iranian elementary school"

Would be more apt.

[manyaoman]

I don't think that's correct according to the newly published video. Correct me if wrong, but I think it shows a Tomahawk hitting nearby the school, and based on the amount of dust it seems that the school was already hit moments earlier. So it still isn't 100% clear if the school was also hit by a Tomahawk or by something else.

[nyantaro1]

Yeah, an iranian missile must have hit that school minutes before an american Tomahawk landed near that school

[manyaoman]

I guess it's possible it was hit by an Iranian interceptor rocket. But even if that's the case, US would still share the blame.

[ghusto]

It's the Guardian. Not exactly known for it's unbiased and objective reporting.

[gerash]

That’s a large portion of the western media across the gamut.

examples here:

https://x.com/jvplive/status/2031400460741984314

https://x.com/assalrad