|
|
|
|
|
by dcaylor
4971 days ago
|
|
The title of the article is misleading. The issue here isn't about putting cameras on private property. As I understand it, the judge was saying that in a place that the police could have searched or could have themselves hidden and watched in person without a warrant they can also put a camera without a warrant. I'm as bothered as just about anybody about the erosion of 4th amendment protections, but this doesn't appear to me to be one of those. This is not about someone's residence. It is about rules for searching "open fields." |
|