[WillAdams]

The thing about _The Matrix_ is that the world-building was much more interesting than the premise (to make a world in which comicbook superheroes made sense).

Not seeing why human misery is necessary --- that line always felt propaganda-like --- a utopia would arguably be more stable since there would be less striving for change.

[awesome_dude]

> there would be less striving for change

Precisely, there would be nothing to strive for.

As an engineer I often say "If everything in life went to plan it would be a very boring life indeed"

[WillAdams]

Yes, so the "computer" would continue running in this state without change --- which is presumably what the machines in charge wanted --- if there's supposed to be a reason which makes stress pleasing to the machines please state it in plain and simple terms (English is not my mother-tongue).

[awesome_dude]

Your thinking that its the machines being pleased by the state is 100% wrong.

WHY would a machine need a simulation at all?

[krapp]

In the original draft, the machines were using human brains as a networked computer. The simulation is necessary because sensory input and simulation is how human brains compute - it's for the humans, not the machines. Unfortunately the studios thought that was too complicated and we wound up with "lol batteries" and none of it makes any sense.

Also, I mean, because without that there wouldn't be a movie.

[awesome_dude]

Yeah - the whole point of the simulation was to keep the brains engaged. A distraction if you will, from the fact that they aren't actually doing anything.