|
|
|
|
|
|
by synecdoche
98 days ago
|
|
|
I'm puzzled to what point is tried to be made. Is the parent statement supposed to be an argument that women are not capable, or even less likely, of providing means for, or inflicting massive destruction? How would that follow from what is said here or in the article? Certainly women can be destructive too. What would make it a sex issue? |
|
|
I know this is called techbro crowd for a reason, but you know that plenty of women invented things and did scientific discoveries right? especially after they were unbanned from it
> Certainly women can be destructive too
Sure if you say so.
It's just that 0% of these destructive weapons and tech in the article was developed by women.
Maybe there's a pattern here