Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
rollulus
99 days ago
Well that depends on your luck, it could be a valid one about 1/16th of the time.
1 comments
jasomill
99 days ago
1/64, actually, because RFC-compliant (variant 1) UUIDv4 requires fixed values for both the version nibble and two bits of the variant nibble.
The fact that we're discussing this at all is a reasonable argument for using a library function.
link
3eb7988a1663
98 days ago
While it might be invalid, will most libraries choke if you give them a pseudo UUIDv4?
link
efilife
98 days ago
What do you mean? Are you talking about validation of UUIDs?
link
3eb7988a1663
97 days ago
If you generate random bytes, which are unlikely to conform to the UUIDv4 spec, my guess is that most libraries will silently accept the id. That is, generating random bytes, will probably work just work.
link
efilife
97 days ago
But what libraries are you talking about? What is their purpose?
link
rollulus
98 days ago
Nice, thanks and I agree.
link
The fact that we're discussing this at all is a reasonable argument for using a library function.