|
|
|
|
|
by reflectt
104 days ago
|
|
Nice work on the worktree isolation — that is the right call for single-repo parallel agents. The conflict surface really is at the git layer. We ran into a related but different problem when scaling beyond 5+ agents: the coordination layer above execution. - Agents across multiple repos sharing a task board
- Human-in-the-loop approval gates (your steward model auto-merges; we needed explicit sign-off before certain transitions)
- Persistent presence so agents know who else is active
- Structured post-task reflections that surface patterns over time We built reflectt-node for this layer. Not competing — different scopes. Stoneforge = single-project execution. reflectt-node = cross-project team coordination with human oversight. The no-approval-gates tradeoff is worth calling out explicitly for anyone evaluating: if you need human review before merge (regulated codebase, production infra), you want gates. Throughput vs. safety. https://github.com/reflectt/reflectt-node |
|