Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Groxx 102 days ago
[claimed common problem exists, try X to find it] -> [Q about how to best do that] -> "the best way to do it is to do it yourself"

Surely people have found patterns that work reasonably well, and it's not "everyone is completely on their own"? I get that the scene is changing fast, but that's ridiculous.
2 comments
simonw 102 days ago
There's so much superstition and outdated information out there that "try it yourself" really is good advice.

You can do that in conjunction with trying things other people report, but you'll learn more quickly from your own experiments. It's not like prompting a coding agent is expensive or time consuming, for the most part.

link
nl 102 days ago
/security-review really is pretty good.

But your codebase is unique. Slop in one codebase is very dangerous in another.

link
LamaOfRuin 102 days ago
For those not aware, this is a specific feature available in Claude Code.

https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-se...

link
Groxx 101 days ago
that's kinda what I was looking for tbh. I didn't know that was an option, and nothing in the thread (or article) seemed to imply it was.

I was mostly working off "well I could ask claude to look at my code for security problems, i.e. 'plz check for security holes kthx', but is that really going to be the best option?". if "yes", then it would kinda imply that all the customization and prompt-fiddling people do is useless, which seems rather unlikely. a premade tool is a reasonable starting point.

link