|
|
|
|
|
by 0x457
102 days ago
|
|
This is where I disagree. Copyright was most likely violated, but (most likely) because book was obtained not via a legal way. LLMs didn't spit out Harry Potter until it was prompted to do so. There is argument to be make that LLM can be used as transport of pirated content. My argument is that it's not different from searching for "file:pdf Harry Potter" |
|