Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dataflow 109 days ago
I think there might be a confusion here? The 100% seems like the true positive rate (correct detection), not the false positive rate?
1 comments

Nope, 9 of 9 legit sites were incorrectly flagged:

> The tradeoff is that it flagged all 9 of the legitimate sites in our dataset as suspicious

Sorry, I think I had my wires crossed somewhere. Yeah, I see now. That's crazy/hilarious.