[AndriyKunitsyn]

>That fancy ARM-based MacBook with RAM soldered on the CPU package? We've got plenty of crashes from those, good luck replacing that RAM without super-specialized equipment and an extraordinarily talented technician doing the job.

CPU caches and registers - how exactly are they different from a RAM on a SoC in this regard?

[benjaminl]

In just about every way. CPU caches are made from SRAM and live on the CPU itself. Main system RAM is made from DRAM and live on separate chips even if they are soldered into the same physical package (system in package or SiP). The RAM still isn't on the SoC.

[brcmthrowaway]

Unless its gpu

[phs2501]

For one thing, static vs dynamic RAM. Static RAM (which is what's used for your typical CPU cache) is implemented with flip-flops and doesn't need to be refreshed, reads aren't destructive like DRAM, etc.

[stinkbeetle]

At that level, they are not different. They could suffer from UE due to defect, marginal system (voltage, temperature, frequency), or radiation upset, suffer electromigration/aging, etc. And you can't replace them either.

CPUs tend to be built to tolerate upsets, like having ECC and parity in arrays and structures whereas the DRAM on a Macbook probably does not. But there is no objective standard for these things, and redundancy is not foolproof it is just another lever to move reliability equation with.

[wmf]

Caches and registers are also subject to bitflips. In many CPUs the caches use ECC so it's less of a problem. Intel did a study showing that many bits in registers are unused so flipping them doesn't cause problems.