[klustregrif]

> Claim is if they or Claude read the old code (or of course directly use any of it) it is a license violation

The original code is part of claude's training material. With that intepretation of the LGPL AI is incapable of writing non LGPL derivatives. I like that interpretation.

[yxhuvud]

I'm not certain I buy it, but I find it a little hard to motivate the training being fair use if used to regenerate the project in a different licence.