[latexr]

> Because "AGI" (Artificial General Intelligence) has no universally accepted definition, the term "Financial AGI" is defined here as a domain-specific standard that is measurable, auditable, and intentionally narrow.

So essentially, you’re redefining “general” as “specific”. Makes absolutely no sense.

This submission is an ad.

[aharm]

The idea is that its general across a massive domain (i.e. finance) and able to do the entire jobs of human financial experts (not just one part of their jobs). Don't you think that applies here?

[latexr]

No. I think it’s obvious this is an ad and that they’re trying to co-opt a term to make their product look more impressive to gullible investors and customers. It’s not even an original marketing tactic.