[dragonwriter]

> If you just copyright it normally with yourself as the author, seems like it would be fine to copyright whatever bs you want?

That's not really clear; the Copyright Office has guidance on copyright with AI used as a tool (which both complicated and lacks clear, objective standards), but its not at all clear how the courts would view it (I think there have been some trial court cases over it already, but I am not aware of any appellate law).

What is clear is that this case doesn't address that issue at all.