Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jasper_platz 108 days ago
Compared to Claude Code etc where do the time savings come from? Fewer PRs that need manual intervention? Higher quality code base to maintain later?
1 comments

1 - Less "chat as you go" interactions with the agents meaning you don't have to babysit the execution, because once the requirements are defined, the harness executes autonomously.

2 - Conceptually stronger starting point leads to better (and larger) feature PRs. Because we help you generate a really strong spec (prod/tech) upfront, grounded across your repos, that changes the process from "build-and-fix-and-build-and-fix" to "define-and-ship".

And we also help you generate strong standards definitions (teach agents how to build things, how to test things) that foundation helps as well.