|
|
|
|
|
|
by MarkusQ
100 days ago
|
|
|
Sorry. I meant "peer reviewed prior to publication" as the phrase is presently used. I thought that was obvious. What you're calling "peer review" is what I would call "discussed" or "debated" which it certainly was. I dispute your claim that the new paradigm is superior. |
|
|
Accepted. But now there is Arxiv and Biorxiv and even Medrxiv—so we're back to where things were, it seems.