[Moomoomoo309]

Why would it need to be re-evaluated? The financials haven't changed, the end goal hasn't changed, even if the AI is better or more useful, the stuff Zitron puts out assumes AI will continue to get better until the money runs out. Unless the AI genuinely starts taking jobs en masse (and not just being used as an excuse for layoffs), they're still in the same situation.

[frozenseven]

>the stuff Zitron puts out assumes AI will continue to get better until the money runs out

This is categorically false. The big part of his "thing", from the first moment he ever started talking about AI, is the insistence that AI isn't getting better and very soon undergo a devastating collapse.