|
|
|
|
|
|
by versteegen
107 days ago
|
|
|
> Gemini 2.5 Pro's reasoning traces (before they nerfed them) were a good example. The deep technical analysis, and then the human-friendly version in the final output. But I found their reasoning more readable than the final output! They were also sometimes more useful: you could see whether it reasoned its way to an answer, or used faulty reasoning, or if it was just contextual recall. Huge shame they replaced them with garbage (though a bit better now). > the language is surprisingly offputting. I don't know if it got worse I'm pretty sure it did. |
|
|