|
|
|
|
|
by pvaldes
108 days ago
|
|
> The impact to open-water fisheries can be undone if the markets appreciate farm-raised fish for their quality. Is not so simple. Marine Aquaculture needs huge amounts of wild fishes to feed the farm fishes. The more aquaculture you have, more pressure on some fisheries. Also less pressure on other, that in fact adds an extra of pressure to the first fisheries. China has increased its fleet in the last decades for that. All this "fishes are sentient" stuff is toxic for your job. My advice is to avoid it like a plague. This people would be typically unable to keep a carnivore fish alive. |
|
That said, the feed picture has changed a lot over the past two decades. The overall FIFO ratio for aquaculture dropped from 0.63 in 2000 to around 0.22 to 0.28 by 2017 depending on how you calculate it. Modern feeds are increasingly plant based with soy, barley, and other terrestrial proteins making up the bulk of formulations. Up to 30% of fishmeal now comes from processing byproducts rather than whole wild fish. There is also a lot of work happening on alternative proteins like insect meal, algae, and single cell proteins.
The species matters a lot here. Tilapia, catfish, and carps use very little wild fish in their feed. Salmon and shrimp are the outliers that drive most of the wild fish dependency. We are currently working with trout which sits somewhere in the middle.
On the sentience discussion, I am not going to dismiss people who care about fish welfare. It is a legitimate concern and the science on fish cognition is evolving. Our technology actually reduces stress on fish compared to manual handling which involves netting, anesthesia, and physical manipulation. If people care about welfare then better measurement tools that minimize handling should be part of the solution.