[noboostforyou]

I was using a common "phrase" that highlights individual human error vs systemic failures

Since you are stuck on the semantics allow me to rephrase - "if a single developer is able to delete your entire production db, that's an org failure"

[mikkupikku]

Specifying a junior dev on his first day is a plain deliberate rhetorical ploy to frame systemic blame as more legitimate than individual blame. If not, then why not make it a senior developer? Anybody can fuck something up, but we give special consideration to noobs who make noob mistakes, and that's what is being implicitly appealed to, illegitimately. This journalist wasn't a noob, and using ChatGPT to write his article was an error in judgement but not an actual mistake.

[newswasboring]

The original author clarified and you are still stuck here? Take a step back dude it's not that serious.

[mikkupikku]

"You disagree with me? Whoa dude, you need to relax and touch grass."

[newswasboring]

Things are more nuanced than agreeing and disagreeing. If you can't see that then...

[mikkupikku]

I disagree with you, deal with it. Specifying a junior developer to make the point of blaming systems instead of individuals, to absolve a journalist of individual blame for fabricating quotes, is flat out bullshit and you're wrong to try weaselling it.

Inb4 Omg I still can't believe you're disagreeing with me, like yikes dude go outside.

Auroiris is right, it's a Motte and Bailey routine. And it's insulting that you're pretending otherwise.