Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ionwake 110 days ago
one should also consider that even with fake hallucinated AI situation, the productivity and correctness of the work produced by the culprit ( in general ) may still have been of higher quality then before AI regardless of the fails
1 comments

Hard to believe when this judge apparently thought that outsourcing their — extremely confidential, sensitive, and important — work to a known unreliable tool was a good idea. And then further thought that they apparently did not even need to check the results.

Sound like extreme incompetence or laziness.

good point. I was thinking of jobs where you can put stuff into the Ai. No need for the downvotes my point still holds