[Gooblebrai]

> his pre-wealth behavior gives insight into who he really is

"No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man."

Not defending Zuck but it reflects a rigid mindset to assume that people cannot change.

[ElProlactin]

People can change but based on Facebook's actions vis-a-vis privacy, mental health, etc. there's little evidence that Zuckerberg has gone from treating his users like "dumb f...." to treating them like human beings.

If we're going to talk about quotes, here's one: "money amplifies who you are".

[alex1138]

Whatsapp is one of the only instances I can think of in corporate acquisitions where the side being acquired lashes out at the acquiring side as much as this ("It's time. Delete Facebook")

You're talking about someone who changes privacy settings, who was told about gay people being automatically added to groups and posting on their walls so it outed them, being told about this and dismissing it. Or "graph search". He doesn't think people deserve any respect when it's not him?

[godelski]

When a man changes it is on him to prove that he has changed. Has Zuck atoned himself in any way? Has Meta?

I'm a big believer in second chances and letting people rehabilitate, but there's no evidence the Meta or Zuck have changed for the better. Meanwhile, *there is plenty of evidence that suggests he has only become more uncaring and deceptive, as Meta has only become more invasive over time*, the article itself being one such example.

So I do believe Zuck has changed, but not in the direction that we should applaud and/or forgive him. I've only seen him change in the way that should make us more concerned and further justify the hatred. A man may change, but he does not always change for the better.

[rangerelf]

I think there's more than enough evidence that Zuck has not grown to see others as human beings.