|
|
|
|
|
by Aerroon
106 days ago
|
|
Interesting. I'm surprised you feel that it's better than GLM 5 - these models are in different weight classes after all. I tried it out a bunch and it seems good. I can't really tell if it's better or worse than most of these other models in such a short time though. |
|
Where GLM 5 is strictly worse for me though, compared to StepFun, is long-form content generation (planning, research documents) - but this can be said about geminis too and these are obviously very smart models.
Given the free option I'd explore GLM 5 more, but if I had to pay for it myself ofc I'd choose stepfun every time. Basically I think right now the optimal configuration for maximizing output of correct software features per dollar involves using StepFun or its future class competitor for bulk coding and first stage code review.
Maybe I need to write a blogpost about it after all.