|
|
|
|
|
by satvikpendem
107 days ago
|
|
The premise is flawed, I don't see AI taking jobs because companies want to grow in productivity generally speaking and would rather just make their existing employees do more; all productivity saving technologies have always been net positive in the amount of jobs created. |
|
To what extent has the net increase in jobs been because there have just been more people who needed to work in order for society to not collapse?
Population growth is slowing (expected to peak in 2080-ish). To some, AI feels like a different sort of "productivity enhancer" than we've seen in this past.
I don't think the person's premise is flawed. It's more that you just disagree with it.