|
|
|
|
|
by brabel
116 days ago
|
|
If you do that, you end up with all the problems that MCP attempts to solve: how to authorize using a standard mechanism, how to summarize operations in a better way than just dumping the OpenAPI spec on the LLM, providing structured input/output, providing answers to users that the LLM cannot see (for sensitive data or just avoiding polluting the context) and so on. Authorization, in my opinion, is the big problem you need MCP for, though the current MCP Authorization spec still needs some refinement. |
|
MCP in its default state takes up too much context, creating the new for "MCP as code", which seems a bit circular.