[samlinnfer]

>ai description

>ai code

>ai comments

[colbyn]

Why should we presume it’s an AI description? The writing seems reasonable enough. Some people are more naturally inclined towards articulate writing than others (seems like projection) and furthermore the OP claims to be a screenwriter.

[cosmiciron]

AI helped me write the documentation because it does a better job than I ever could. I honestly wish I’d had AI to help me write my screenplay ten years ago.

[colbyn]

Oh I guess I stand corrected. I sometimes wish AI wasn't a thing because any natural talent for writing has now been rendered almost meaningless.

[cosmiciron]

I beg to differ. People equate good writing with the cosmetics, which AI excels at, but it’s the substance that truly matters.

[samlinnfer]

There is at least 1 em-dash per paragraph. /s

I've read a lot of AI generated text and this is definitely one.

However, I also believe in having an objective metric: https://files.catbox.moe/napzf6.png

[tills13]

Low key the comments and replies here look like ai too.

[throwaway290]

Low key? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47213987

[orthoxerox]

You are absolutely right about the AI content! This is not just a vibe-coded utility — this is a completely AI-driven conversation. /s

I wonder what makes AI write its descriptions as puff pieces by default.

[samlinnfer]

When there are no tells anymore, that's when it's really truly over.