|
|
|
|
|
|
by retsibsi
117 days ago
|
|
|
(I'm not a lawyer, but) I don't see the ambiguity. It's a normal grammatical sentence if parsed this way: The Department of War may use the AI System for all lawful purposes, consistent with - applicable law - operational requirements - and well established safety and oversight protocols. Whereas if I try to parse it as a list of 4 items, it's not grammatical: The Department of War may use the AI System - for all lawful purposes - consistent with applicable law - operational requirements - and well-established safety and oversight protocols. |
|
|