|
|
|
|
|
|
by dllthomas
4976 days ago
|
|
|
> [...] which is a fancy way of saying that there's a hidden variable. I'd say it's a less fancy (and more specific) way of saying "hidden variable." I read the parent as saying, "I don't understand why there can't be a hidden variable" which is quite a different thing than saying "this can work without a hidden variable: [thing involving hidden variable]". |
|
|