|
|
|
|
|
by galaxyLogic
119 days ago
|
|
I think the "organizatton" should have membership fees. The members would get a somehow less restrictive license to the software maintained by the organization. The organization needs a way to make something valuable it can charge a (membership) fee for, not just collect donations. Then it can share some of those fees with its developer-contributors, byt distributing a dividend that goes on to prepetuity instead of individual one-time grants. So, two types of members, contributor-developers, and code-using organizations which get a less restrictive license. This seems like a chicken-and-egg problem, but once it starts going it could be sustainable. |
|