|
|
|
|
|
by danielweber
4976 days ago
|
|
I'm not necessarily supporting the concept, but this seems a strained objection. It's equivocating the word "public." People who get social security (which comes from the government, and so is just as "public") can use it for religious causes and no one bats an eye. And SCOTUS has approved vouchers funded via tax credits. |
|