[esafak]

The project does not list portability as a concern. It's for agent use; they are not trying to re-use existing bash code.

[gaigalas]

Before, you said:

> they use it because there's a lot of training material.

Now, you say:

> they are not trying to re-use existing bash code.

Can't you see how this is a contradiction?

---

I'm sorry, I can't continue like this. I want to have meaningful conversations.

[esafak]

Is English your second language? "They" refers to very different things here.

[gaigalas]

The issue here is not language, is basic understanding of how LLMs are trained, how agents act on that training and what is the role of the shell from a systems perspective.

I can't have a meaningful conversation with someone that doesn't fully grasp those, no matter in which language.