[defun]

I guess what he was meaning is that in Erlang in most cases you can work with strings as iolists.

Maybe here you can find a bit better explanation: http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2012-May/066590...

[lukego]

Right. This is like the POSIX features writev() and 'struct iovec'. Essentially all of Erlang's binary output primitives are happy to take an iolist/iovec instead of a plain string and this means fewer concatenations and/or system calls. Good feature.

[nivertech]

iolists map nicely to gather-write writev(), but unfortunately there is no Erlang primitives for scatter-read readv()

[jlouis]

This isn't entirely true, see file:pread/2 for how to do it with a file. We lack a binary:pread/2 though :)

[nivertech]

thanks for pointing it out, looks like it will not work with sockets though.

Also spec says that it will return list of either strings or binaries, not exactly iolist.

[masklinn]

> Also spec says that it will return list of either strings or binaries, not exactly iolist.

It's a proper subset of iolists, since it reads from flat data (a file) there isn't much sense in its adding arbitrary amounts of nesting to it.