|
|
|
|
|
by cx42net
110 days ago
|
|
So your whole point is the *hypothetical* "what if Bluesky turns bad". And just with that hypothetical, you scratch the whole effort Bluesky is currently doing to offer an open protocol ? Which is the opposite of almost (Mastodon) all other social networks ? Come on.. It honestly feel like this was written by someone being paid by a competitor, just to discredit the service. Of course they will provide an infrastructure to ease users on to creating and using their service, they can't just provide an empty shell just for the pure purpose of decoupling the protocol and the service. You can't blame them for that (well, you can apparently..) |
|