[ranger_danger]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_nm_process

[hinkley]

I still think we should have gone with average gates per square mm as a new yardstick. It would also make sense to the Numbers Go Up people.

[itopaloglu83]

It’s going to be quite funny if they can go below 40nm in gate pitch size, because they’ll need to call it 0nm.

[dogma1138]

They are moving to angstroms, hence 18A for example.

[etyhhgfff]

Another marketing gag could be -1nm