|
|
|
|
|
by turtledragonfly
118 days ago
|
|
> FreeBSD was perfectly fine but it didn't do anything I needed that Linux didn't already do. I broadly agree, even as a FreeBSD fan myself; things have converged a lot over the decades. But still, I generally feel that while you can get the same work done in both, FreeBSD does things better (and/or cleaner, more elegant, etc) in many cases. The overall feeling of system cohesion makes me happier to use it, from small things like Ctrl-T producing meaningful output for all the base OS tools, to larger and more amorphous things like having greater confidence core systems won't change too quickly over time (eg: FreeBSD's relatively stable sound support, versus Linux's alsa/pulse/pipewire/..., similar for event APIs, and more). Though I totally feel your pain about latest-and-greatest hardware driver support. Has gotten better since the '90s, but that gap will probably always be there due to the different development philosophies. I hope FreeBSD never gets too "Linux-y"; it occupies it's own nice spot in the spectrum of available options. |
|
What would that mean?