[ryandrake]

Not just thots but thots with inevitable links to their OnlyFans pages. It seems that FB and Instagram's primary purpose has become funneling people into OnlyFans. I wonder if Zucc has caught on to this and is at least getting some revenue share from OF.

[JohnMakin]

He has testified to congress that IG/meta does not promote sexual content, which is nuts, because anyone who’s spent 5 mins on the platform knows this absolutely not the case

[naravara]

In my experience it’s mostly sexual adjacent content with just enough plausible deniability that you could say it’s a comedic sketch or something. They’re not funny, and the punchline is usually tits, but it has the cosmetic structure of a joke.

[Maxion]

Yeah linktr.ee links instead of OF links.

[r_lee]

I think its just by nature very engaging, as dudes will go look at other posts and comment (at least the older ones) about their looks etc...

[socalgal2]

Both can be true. IG/Meta does not promote sexual content. Users promote sexual content. That might be subtle but there is a real distinction.

[kirubakaran]

> That might be subtle but there is a real distinction.

A distinction without a difference, as the expression goes

[JohnMakin]

And who controls what user content goes into user feeds?